Approved PB Minutes 3/28/13

Approved Copy PB Minutes 3/28/13

Meeting opened at 7:08, all members were present.

Previous minutes were approved – motion by Linda M, second by Dave K, motion carried.

We first met with family members concerned with the sale of property adjacent to them on Seneca Lake. It is listed as a buildable lot which was questioned by the family. They were also concerned about how any building would affect an underground drainage pipe that borders the properties. The PB related zoning info pertinent to the lot. It seems it is not actually large enough to build a permanent structure. The issue will be referred to the code enforcement officer and town attorney.

Todd informed the board about our committee meeting with the Romulus PB committee concerning zoning issues in the Seneca Army Depot. They have similar thoughts about the possibilities of development on this land and how it may impact new tax revenues. Todd produced a map of the depot with current and possible uses for certain areas. Opening County Rd 135 and fencing one or both sides was discussed. Mr. Aronson is going to meet with the Romulus committee to devise a usage map for them. A couple more committee meetings are scheduled.

We then discussed our priorities for zoning needs over the next six months. The consensus of the board is to work immediately on designating and defining a small portion of the depot in the SE corner that NE Freight is currently using. It is our goal to geographically map this area, designate allowed uses, define what is not allowed and protect the values important to the community. Our goal is to have this accomplished by the June meeting and move it forward for a public hearing.

When this goal is accomplished we will turn our attention to completing the section on PUD’s. This should not take more than three meetings. From that point we will move on to reconsider zoning in regard to the old army depot.

For homework board members are to research zoning information that would be comparable to the depot area we would like to rezone. Some suggested towns were Geneva, Windsor, and the Corning area. Our goal is to integrate light industry, transportation, and rail enterprises without adversely impacting the conservation area of the depot.

Todd also informed the board of an upcoming educational course in May. Four members will attend.

Meeting adjourned at 9:05 – motion made by Linda, seconded by Bill.

Respectfully submitted,

Barry Somerville, secretary

Approved Minutes PB 2/28/13

Meeting called to order at 7:10 pm. Members present: Hershey S, Todd H, David K, Barry S, Linda M.

Motion was received by Dave K to accept the previous meeting minutes, second by Hershey S, approved by all.

Guest speaker – Bruce Habberfield from Finger Lakes Railway. Bob Hayssen was also present to meet with Mr. Habberfield and our board.

Todd H informed the board of meetings he held with Bob Aronson, Tom Bouchard and Bill Karlsen. He and Bob discussed possible development for the Depot area of Varick and drew up some of these ideas on an area map. These will be copied and distributed to board members at the next meeting.

Todd met with Tom and Bill to discuss possible zoning changes for the depot. Later we proposed a joint committee to exchange ideas about this issue. Two PB members and the chair from each board would meet on March 21. Linda M and Hershey S volunteered from our board. Todd will contact Tom to confirm a meeting.

Bruce Habberfield informed us where FL Railway would build a possible spur to come into the Romulus side of the depot. This would cut off about 4 miles of travel for trains. Rail business would open up the SW and SE sections of the depot in Varick on either side of the rail loop which needs to be considered for zoning. He gave us a brief history of the FLR and how it strategically connects to other rail systems in the state. The depot is strategically located as a hub for the transfer of numerous goods such as agriculture, lumber, plastic resins, sand and pipe for shale drilling. It would have a low impact on the community since this part of the depot is largely out of sight. Bruce is going to work up a site map to give us an idea of how the current facilities could be used and accommodate certain businesses.

The board discussed the need of solving the issue of zoning for NE Freight. It seems we will need to do this in two stages. First, address the needs of this company and zone a commercial area that will allow them to continue business in the town. Second, address the need to rezone sections of the depot other than conservation. This stage will take longer because there are numerous issues to consider.

In regard to the first stage we need to specify a name for a zoning area that will accommodate NE Freight as well as other appropriate businesses. We then need to define the permissible uses for this area and fully map it out. Then the normal procedures for approval will be followed.

Meeting was adjourned at 9:05 – motion made by Linda, second by Barry, approved by all.

Next meeting is scheduled for March 28.

Respectfully submitted,

Barry Somerville, secretary

Approved Minutes PB Meeting 1/3/13

Meeting called to order at 7:03 p.m. Members present – Todd H, Bill S, Barry S, Linda M, Tom B, two new members – David Kidd, Hershey Sensenig.

First order of business brought by Larry Colton who had a zoning question concerning construction of a pole barn at 4946 Rt 89, Romulus, NY. Larry thought the setback was 300’ from the centerline of Rt. 89. However, since this is a combined Agriculture and Rural Residential area there are no restrictions on building said structure. Mr. Colton will approve a building permit.

Mr. Bob Aronson met with us from the Industrial Development Agency concerning the use of the depot by North East Freight. This area is currently zoned as a conservation area, but portions are being reconsidered for a zoning change. Mr. Aronson gave us input from his agency’s viewpoint of how this whole area might be developed from a business/industry/commerce perspective. He gave us some valuable information that will help us move forward about the issue of the road and rail entrance for NE Freight as well as considerations that might enhance development of this area while keeping within the boundaries of our comprehensive plan.

It was brought to our attention that one of the best and most likely benefits of the depot area is the railroad. This would be valuable for storage and transportation of goods to other parts of the northeast.

Todd Horton mapped out a strategy to get moving on this issue. We have set up a schedule for all PB members to tour the depot so we understand the layout and how facilities are currently being used. This will be completed by January 12. We also need to acquire good maps of the area to facilitate our knowledge of the layout (rail, roads, buildings, etc.) We then need to define a zoning area. We will continue to seek the input of IDA as to how we can mutually help each other to put forward the best zoning plan.

It is the intent of the PB to make sure all development is within the parameters of our comprehensive plan.

Mr. Aronson was asked to briefly define the purpose of his agency. Basically, they are a delivery mechanism for the economic development of specified areas of New York State. They attempt to provide incentives for businesses to locate in these areas.

 The PB appreciated the input of Mr. Aronson. He helped us to see the big picture and that we need to take some time to properly plan any changes to our current code.

The minutes for our 11/29/12 meeting were approved with two abstentions. Tom B made the motion, seconded by Linda M. Tim also made a motion to accept the special meeting minutes for 12/13/12, seconded by Bill S. Minutes approved by all.

Our next meeting will be held on January 24.

Linda moved to close the meeting, Hershey S. seconded the motion.

Respectfully submitted,

Barry Somerville

Approved Copy Special Meeting 12/13/12

PB Special Meeting – 12/13/12

Meeting called to order by Todd H at 5:00 pm. Members present: Phil Knapp, Bill Squires, Todd Horton, Linda Mastellar, Tom Bjorkman, Barry Somerville. Bob Hayssen and Larry Colton were also present.

The purpose of our meeting was to receive information concerning North East Freight Transfer using the old Seneca Army Depot as a freight transfer station. Material comes in by rail and ships out by truck. Access to the use area is at the SW corner of the depot in the town of Varick with access to 96a. The company needs town permission to use this area for the above purpose. However, that part of the town is in the conservation zone which does not allow such use. A special use permit cannot be granted.

Tim H met with members of NE Freight and Bob Hayssen to discuss the situation and see what we can do to accommodate the business use of this section of Varick. The company seems to be legitimate and want to operate within the parameters of the law. Rather than issue a cease and desist order the PB and TB would like to consider modifying the zoning code to make this area available for NE Freight’s needs.

It was decided that Larry C will write a letter to the company informing them of our intent not to issue a cease and desist order and that we will work on amending the code. However, this will take some time and they need to know that if they continue with infrastructure repairs and construction they may be at risk of losing their investment.

Todd is going to try to set up a meeting with members of the NE Freight, town officials, and PB to visit the site so we understand the layout of the zoning area in question. This will help us have a visual idea of what structures, roads, railway, etc are involved.

Larry C asked the board if there were any restrictions on the property at the SW corner of Rte. 96a and Yale Station Rd being used as residential property v. commercial. He told an interested buyer that they would have to prove there were no underground tanks present since it used to be an old gas station. Otherwise it could be sold for residential use.

Larry also informed us of an area variance granted at a residence on Cayuga St in Romulus to allow a new trailer to replace an old one without having to construct a concrete pad.

At our next meeting (Jan. 3) we will discuss the moratorium issue for PUD’s. We will also deal with who is to serve as interim in the absence of the Zoning Code officer.

This is Phil Knapp’s last meeting. Members of the PB thanked him for his valuable input on the board for the last five years. We appreciate his involvement and faithfulness as a member of the board.

Meeting adjourned at 6:10 pm, motion made by Tom, seconded by Phil, all approved.

Respectfully submitted,

Barry Somerville

Approved Copy Minutes 11/29/12

Meeting called to order at 7:30 pm by Tom B as substitute chairperson. Members present were Tom B, Phil K, Linda M, and Barry S.

The minutes of the previous meeting were motioned for approval by Phil, seconded by Linda. Motion passed.

We have decided to add a line for PUD usage per district in section 308 of our current zoning code.

There was a brief discussion concerning the difference between a subdivision and a PUD. The PB feels that PUD’s may be preferable to subdivisions for our town. There is more flexibility for development on smaller lots of land yet still fit well with the overall comprehensive plan.

The PB board was grateful for the information forwarded by Mr. Sipos. It will be helpful to us in our study of PUD’s and what should be included in the code. However, the PB would still like to request a moratorium on the issue because we think a section on PUD’s should be included in our current zoning code rather than become a separate town law. A request will be forwarded to the TB to add this to the next meeting agenda (12/4/12).

We spent the rest of the meeting reviewing minimum acreage for PUD’s as well as minimum setback requirements. We thought the Fayette code acreage for PUD’s (25 to 35 acres) was quite large. We were more comfortable with a minimum of 10 acres and a maximum of seven houses in that area. However, no lot can be less than .7 acres. This will also allow for reduced setbacks for irregular shaped lots. The PB determined that such lots should be a minimum of 50’ width at the road and no less than 50’ at any place in the lot. A house must have a 40’ setback from the road and a 90’ width at that point on the lot. Side setbacks shall be at least 15’.

The PB is also concerned that PUD’s not be placed so as to create congested areas. Restrictions will be set in place to assure that such developments are not too close to each other. It is also agreed that road access would be allowed through lake district land.

The meeting adjourned at 9:01 pm – motion made by Linda, seconded by Phil and approved by all. The tentative date for the next meeting is 1/3/13.

Respectfully submitted,

Barry Somerville, secretary